On 2017-08-24, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Josh Holland <anowlcalledj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sphinx will now generate the table of contents automatically, which
> > avoids having the ToC getting out of sync with the rest of the document.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Holland <anowlcalledj...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/security/keys/core.rst | 12 +-----------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/security/keys/core.rst 
> > b/Documentation/security/keys/core.rst
> > index 312f981fa..1266eeae4 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/security/keys/core.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/security/keys/core.rst
> > @@ -16,17 +16,7 @@ The key service can be configured on by enabling:
> >  
> >  This document has the following sections:
> >  
> > -   - Key overview
> > -   - Key service overview
> > -   - Key access permissions
> > -   - SELinux support
> > -   - New procfs files
> > -   - Userspace system call interface
> > -   - Kernel services
> > -   - Notes on accessing payload contents
> > -   - Defining a key type
> > -   - Request-key callback service
> > -   - Garbage collection
> > +.. contents:: :local:
> 
> Did you actually try this and look at the 'make htmldocs' results?
> 
> I know I tried what I suggested:
> 
> .. contents::
>    :local:
> 
> http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#table-of-contents

Yep, I tried with sphinx_rtd_theme and it looks fine.  The documentation
suggests that the two forms are equivalent:

> If the default title is to be used, the options field list may begin
> on the same line as the directive marker:
>
>   .. contents:: :depth: 2

I went for the single-line version purely because that's what's used in
Documentation/security/credentials.rst (one of two existing users of
"contents::"), and I figured I may as well be consistent within the
security docs.  I have no particular preference either way.

Thanks,

Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to