On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:26:58AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:38 AM, James Hogan <jho...@kernel.org> wrote: > > So lets call it a day and drop the Meta architecture port from the > > kernel. RIP Meta. > > Since I brought up the architecture removal independently, I could > pick this up into a git tree that also has the removal of some of the > other architectures. > > I see your tree is part of linux-next, so you could also just put it > in there and send a pull request at the merge window if you prefer. > > The only real reason I see for a shared git tree would be to avoid > conflicts when we touch the same Kconfig files or #ifdefs in driver, > but Meta only appears in > > config FRAME_POINTER > bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers" > depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && \ > (CRIS || M68K || FRV || UML || \ > SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300 || METAG) || \ > ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS > > and > > include/trace/events/mmflags.h:#elif defined(CONFIG_PARISC) || > defined(CONFIG_METAG) || defined(CONFIG_IA64) > > so there is little risk.
I'm happy to put v2 in linux-next now (only patch 4 has changed, I just sent an updated version), and send you a pull request early next week so you can take it from there. The patches can't be directly applied with git-am anyway thanks to the -D option to make them more concise. Sound okay? Thanks James
Description: Digital signature