On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:02 PM, James Hogan <jho...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:26:58AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:38 AM, James Hogan <jho...@kernel.org> wrote: >> > So lets call it a day and drop the Meta architecture port from the >> > kernel. RIP Meta. >> >> Since I brought up the architecture removal independently, I could >> pick this up into a git tree that also has the removal of some of the >> other architectures. >> >> I see your tree is part of linux-next, so you could also just put it >> in there and send a pull request at the merge window if you prefer. >> >> The only real reason I see for a shared git tree would be to avoid >> conflicts when we touch the same Kconfig files or #ifdefs in driver, >> but Meta only appears in >> >> config FRAME_POINTER >> bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers" >> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && \ >> (CRIS || M68K || FRV || UML || \ >> SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300 || METAG) || \ >> ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS >> >> and >> >> include/trace/events/mmflags.h:#elif defined(CONFIG_PARISC) || >> defined(CONFIG_METAG) || defined(CONFIG_IA64) >> >> so there is little risk. > > I'm happy to put v2 in linux-next now (only patch 4 has changed, I just > sent an updated version), and send you a pull request early next week so > you can take it from there. The patches can't be directly applied with > git-am anyway thanks to the -D option to make them more concise. > > Sound okay?
Yes, sounds good, thanks! Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html