> Replying late to this thread, I don't think this is right for V4L2. When > it comes to solving the .remove() vs. userspace race, I think the right > solution is at the cdev level.
Isn't there even prototype code from Dan Williams? "[PATCH 1/3] cdev: Finish the cdev api with queued mode support" https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/20/997
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
