On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 12:47:16PM +0900, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Replying late to this thread, I don't think this is right for V4L2. When > > it comes to solving the .remove() vs. userspace race, I think the right > > solution is at the cdev level. > > Isn't there even prototype code from Dan Williams? > > "[PATCH 1/3] cdev: Finish the cdev api with queued mode support" > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/20/997
I mentioned that in my LPC talk in 2022 :-) I think we should merge that (or a rebased, possibly improved version of it). I've meant to try plumbing that series in V4L2 but couldn't find the time so far. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
