On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 04:56:38PM +0000, Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> 
> > Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2026 10:18 AM
> > To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; Koen De Schepper (Nokia) 
> > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 3/3] virtio_net: Accurate ECN flag in 
> > virtio_net_hdr
> > 
> > 
> > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking 
> > links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional 
> > information.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> > 
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 11:55:10PM +0100, [email protected] 
> > wrote:
> > > From: Chia-Yu Chang <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Unlike RFC 3168 ECN, accurate ECN uses the CWR flag as part of the ACE 
> > > field to count new packets with CE mark; however, it will be corrupted 
> > > by the RFC 3168 ECN-aware TSO. Therefore, fallback shall be applied by 
> > > seting NETIF_F_GSO_ACCECN to ensure that the CWR flag should not be 
> > > changed within a super-skb.
> > >
> > > To apply the aforementieond new AccECN GSO for virtio, new featue bits 
> > > for host and guest are added for feature negotiation between driver 
> > > and device. And the translation of Accurate ECN GSO flag between 
> > > virtio_net_hdr and skb header for NETIF_F_GSO_ACCECN is also added to 
> > > avoid CWR flag corruption due to RFC3168 ECN TSO.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chia-Yu Chang <[email protected]>
> > 
> > 
> > To the best of my understanding, this is a new feature - support for 
> > VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ACCECN, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ACCECN?
> > The commit log makes it sound like it fixes some behaviour for existing 
> > hardware, but that is not the case.
> > 
> 
> Thansk for the feedback, I will update commit message in v3.
> > 
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > - Replace VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN with VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN_FLAGS
> > 
> > but where is v2? this is v1...
> 
> I shall update this version as v2, will do at the next version.
> 
> [...]
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h 
> > > b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h index 1db45b01532b..af5bfe45aa1f 
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h
> > > @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
> > >  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ      22      /* Device supports Receive Flow
> > >                                        * Steering */
> > >  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR 23        /* Set MAC address */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ACCECN 25  /* Host can handle GSO of AccECN 
> > > +*/ #define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ACCECN 26 /* Guest can handle GSO of 
> > > +AccECN */
> > >  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_DEVICE_STATS 50 /* Device can provide 
> > > device-level statistics. */  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL 52 /* 
> > > Device supports virtqueue notification coalescing */
> > >  #define VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTF_COAL       53      /* Device supports 
> > > notifications coalescing */
> > > @@ -165,6 +167,9 @@ struct virtio_net_hdr_v1 {  #define 
> > > VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL (VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_IPV4 | \
> > >                                      VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_IPV6)
> > >  #define VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN               0x80    /* TCP has ECN set 
> > > */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ACCECN    0x10    /* TCP AccECN segmentation 
> > > */
> > > +#define VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN_FLAGS (VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN | \
> > > +                                      VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ACCECN)
> > >       __u8 gso_type;
> > >       __virtio16 hdr_len;     /* Ethernet + IP + tcp/udp hdrs */
> > >       __virtio16 gso_size;    /* Bytes to append to hdr_len per frame */
> > 
> > 
> > UAPI changes need to be added to the virtio spec.
> > Pls get this approved by the virtio TC.
> > Thanks!
> 
> There were some discussions last October in [email protected] 
> mailing list.


That's it I could not find it. Could you include the archive link pls? 


> At that moment, it is suggested to make Linux kernel accept new comments for 
> SKB_GSO_TCP_ECN and SKB_GSO_TCP_ACCECN first.
> So, could virtio-spec colleague give your feedback? (Parav?).
> 
> Otherwise, the CWR handling of virtio will be wrong after all Accurate ECN 
> commits are merged in Linux.
> 
> Chia-Yu

if there's a general agreement we don't need to block linux on tc
approval.

-- 
MST


Reply via email to