I'm for the the current system, where reply-to is not munged to the mailing list address. More information about the reasons:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html I don't care if I get replies to my mailing list posts twice. I usually try to remove the original sender from ml replies, but don't always remember to do so. And occasionally, to emphasis the need for original sender to get the reply, I deliberately leave the original author's address there. Per sender's request I removed the To: header from this reply (well, as said above, I would have done that anyway). Tomi Tuesday Feb 4 14:23:16 +0100 2003 Juri Haberland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 01:21:59PM +0100, Ulrich Petri wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> it seems this list behaves diffrent from other list i'm on. > >> If i press reply here the email-address of the person who posted the > >> message is filled in, not the ml-address. Why is this? e.g. the vdr-ml > >> bahves the other way (and there are many that do). > >> > >> Ciao Ulrich > > > > looks like the mailing list software does not set the reply-to header > > which is ok and not required. Maybe you can teach your mailclient to > > set it appropriately (I have it defined in mutt so I can simply press > > "L" and do a "list reply". Otherwise just select "reply to all" and both > > the original author and the list should receive a copy of your mail. > > If you use "reply all" please delete the original author, as most people > (incuding me) don't like it beeing cc'ed on a mail that is going to ML > that I already receive. > > Cheers, > Juri > > > > -- > Info: > To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as >subject. -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
