On Tuesday 04 February 2003 21:02, you wrote: > I think that's mostly nonsense blabla. It's nearly arrogant. > > If I REALLY want to reply only to the author, I still can look up his > adress in the "FROM:" header. > > In most cases I do want to reply to the list. > But I do very often click accidently on "Reply" instead of "reply to all" > (and other do so, too), I'm sure I am not the only one. And if one clicks > on "Reply to all" he has to (or at least should) remove the senders adress. > It all causes only confusion and this is the first mailing list I > subscribed that shows this behaviour. > > My point of view is: > > 1.) In absolutely the most cases you want to reply to the list > > 2.) If one wants to reply private, he can still do. Just copy the Adress > from the FROM: header > > 3.) The current handling does nothing than cause confusion by many > accidently "mislead" mails, I see NO advantage > > 4.) The IMHO VERY rare "Can't Find My Way Back Home"-cases (see below) -> > bad luck
Yes 100% ACK. If someone have another meaning, then maybe he can tell me how I enable the list reply in Kmail. Kmail doesn't even recognize the list as such (the other ML I get it recognizes). I haven't seen on the Website any real argument why it should be harmful to change the current behavior. -- Regards Steffen ____________________ counter.li.org : #296567. machine: 181800 vdr-box : 87 ____________________ Please dont CC me, since if I have replied I'll watch the tread. Both mails will be filtered to the ML-folder. Thanks -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
