On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 09:33:58AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > On 11/12/2025 9:52 PM, Joanne Chang wrote: > > Add test cases to verify f2fs's support for different versions of the > > "test_dummy_encryption" mount option. > > > > To ensure test robustness, the MKFS_OPTIONS and MOUNT_OPTIONS are > > cleared. This prevents additional options from interfereing with the > > test results. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joanne Chang <[email protected]> > > To Zorro, > > The changes look good to me, though, still I want to confirm that whether > it is recommended or not to add new cases in old testcase.
Hi Chao, I think this case isn't a regression test to uncover a known bug, it's a basic mount options test for f2fs. So that makes sense to me to add "test_dummy_encryption" into f2fs/016, especially if it doesn't need to bring in more _require_* restriction (right?) . Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <[email protected]> Thanks, Zorro > > Thanks, > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
