On 11/15/2025 2:49 PM, Zorro Lang wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 09:33:58AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
On 11/12/2025 9:52 PM, Joanne Chang wrote:
Add test cases to verify f2fs's support for different versions of the
"test_dummy_encryption" mount option.
To ensure test robustness, the MKFS_OPTIONS and MOUNT_OPTIONS are
cleared. This prevents additional options from interfereing with the
test results.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Chang <[email protected]>
To Zorro,
The changes look good to me, though, still I want to confirm that whether
it is recommended or not to add new cases in old testcase.
Hi Chao,
I think this case isn't a regression test to uncover a known bug, it's a
basic mount options test for f2fs. So that makes sense to me to add
"test_dummy_encryption" into f2fs/016, especially if it doesn't need to
bring in more _require_* restriction (right?) .
Zorro,
Thanks for the confirmation, I agree w/ that.
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Zorro
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
