Just in case, or maybe this patch should be put after [patch 2/5],which
let BG_GC avoids
skipping BG_GC victim, then SSR can also select the BG_GC victim to
allocate data blocks,
which can make bggc selected section get back to full state.
On 2018/7/24 17:36, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2018/7/24 17:27, Yunlong Song wrote:
Without this patch, f2fs only clears victim_secmap when it finds out
that the section has no valid blocks at all, but forgets to clear the
victim_secmap when the whole section has full valid blocks.
Look this patch again, I have a question, why bggc selected section can
get back to full state?
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.s...@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index cfff7cf..0a79554 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -776,7 +776,8 @@ static void __remove_dirty_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info
*sbi, unsigned int segno,
if (test_and_clear_bit(segno, dirty_i->dirty_segmap[t]))
dirty_i->nr_dirty[t]--;
- if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0)
+ if (get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0 ||
+ get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi))
clear_bit(GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno),
dirty_i->victim_secmap);
}
.
--
Thanks,
Yunlong Song
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel