https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565
--- Comment #9 from yuch...@huawei.com --- On 2020/7/24 11:21, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565 > > --- Comment #8 from Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) --- > Chao, why do we need to revert that patch? After applying your new patch, below race condition should no longer happen, right? Thread A Thread B f2fs_write_checkpoint() - block_operations(sbi) - f2fs_lock_all(sbi); - down_write(&sbi->cp_rwsem); - open() - igrab() - write() write inline data - unlink() - f2fs_sync_node_pages() + if (!do_balance) + goto write_node; <---- this avoids running into iput(). - if (is_inline_node(page)) - flush_inline_data() - ilookup() page = f2fs_pagecache_get_page() if (!page) goto iput_out; iput_out: -close() -iput() iput(inode); - f2fs_evict_inode() - f2fs_truncate_blocks() - f2fs_lock_op() - down_read(&sbi->cp_rwsem); > > Zhiguo, > You can see the patch here. > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev&id=b0f3b87fb3abc42c81d76c6c5795f26dbdb2f04b > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
