https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565
--- Comment #11 from Zhiguo.Niu (zhiguo....@unisoc.com) --- (In reply to Jaegeuk Kim from comment #10) > if we revert it, we're not going to call f2fs_flush_inline_data() in > checkpoint path, which actually fixes generic/204? Hi Jaeqeuk Kim, I still have a problem: As new patch modified, flush_dirty_inode will be skipped for avoiding dead lock, but when/where flush_dirty_inode would be done? thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
