On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 03:31:46PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> @@ -293,10 +294,6 @@ static void f2fs_destroy_casefold_cache(void)
> {
> kmem_cache_destroy(f2fs_cf_name_slab);
> }
> -#else
> -static int __init f2fs_create_casefold_cache(void) { return 0; }
> -static void f2fs_destroy_casefold_cache(void) { }
> -#endif
[...]
> @@ -4611,7 +4608,10 @@ static int __init init_f2fs_fs(void)
> err = f2fs_init_compress_cache();
> if (err)
> goto free_compress_mempool;
> - err = f2fs_create_casefold_cache();
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE))
> + err = f2fs_create_casefold_cache();
> +
> if (err)
> goto free_compress_cache;
> return 0;
> @@ -4654,7 +4654,9 @@ static int __init init_f2fs_fs(void)
>
> static void __exit exit_f2fs_fs(void)
> {
> - f2fs_destroy_casefold_cache();
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE))
> + f2fs_destroy_casefold_cache();
> +
I don't think the above two changes are actually an improvement. It's cleaner
to use stub functions to keep the callers simpler, as the original code did.
- Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
