"Theodore Ts'o" <ty...@mit.edu> writes: > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 03:31:36PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: >> The case-insensitive implementations in f2fs and ext4 have quite a bit >> of duplicated code. This series simplifies the ext4 version, with the >> goal of extracting ext4_ci_compare into a helper library that can be >> used by both filesystems. It also reduces the clutter from many >> codeguards for CONFIG_UNICODE; as requested by Linus, they are part of >> the codeflow now. >> >> While there, I noticed we can leverage the utf8 functions to detect >> encoded names that are corrupted in the filesystem. Therefore, it also >> adds an ext4 error on that scenario, to mark the filesystem as >> corrupted. > > Gabriel, are you planning on doing another version of this patch > series? > It looks like the first two patches for ext4 are not controversial, so > I could take those, while some of the other patches have questions > which Eric has raised.
Hi Ted, I'll be reworking the series to apply Eric's comments and I might render patch 1 unnecessary. I'd be happy to send a v5 for the whole thing instead of applying the first two now. Thanks, -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
