On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 2:26 AM Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 04:20:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote: > > syzbot has bisected this issue to: > > > > commit 80f31d2a7e5f4efa7150c951268236c670bcb068 > > Author: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> > > Date: Thu May 8 05:14:32 2025 +0000 > > That's not possible; this commit is after the original report. > > That said, there _is_ a double folio_unlock() in this patch, which > I'm about to send a fix for. It's just not fixing the original report. >
Thanks for bringing this up! The underlying problem is that syzbot has merged several unrelated kernel crashes into one bug report (`kernel BUG in folio_unlock` is just a too generic title). The reported bisection result seems to be correct, but it refers to only one of those incorrectly merged bugs. I've just sent a fix for the syzbot's crash report parsing code [1]. It won't affect this specific bug report, but once the new code is deployed, syzbot will re-report the two underlying findings separately. [1] https://github.com/google/syzkaller/pull/6081 -- Aleksandr _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
