Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix security extensions

[Daniel Phillips]

"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
> atomicity is not an option you can enable or disable arbitrarily

Hmm, I was planning to do exactly that in Tux2 because a) it's easy and
b) its not possible to forsee all the places where applications want
things to be atomic.  A full-data JFS should also be able to offer this
option.  Weren't we going to come up with an API to control this?

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]