Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix security extensions

[Andreas Gruenbacher]

On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> > NFSv4 indeed specifies yet another variant of ACLs.
> 
> Yep.  In fact, it defines a richer environment than POSIX.  However, I
> _think_ that for any POSIX ACL, you can define an NFSv4 list which is
> equivalent in all details (although the reverse is definitely not
> true). 

NFSv4 defines additional permissions.

Unless I've missed something again, there's no mapping for Posix ACL_MASK
entries, though.


Andreas

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Andreas Gruenbacher, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Contact information: http://www.bestbits.at/~ag/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]