On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:03:32PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
>
> This takes care of all of the direct callers of vfs_mknod().
> Since a few of these cases also handle normal file creation
> as well, this also covers some calls to vfs_create().
Ok.
> diff -puN
> fs/namei.c~18-24-sys-mknodat-elevate-write-count-for-vfs-mknod-create
> fs/namei.c
> --- lxc/fs/namei.c~18-24-sys-mknodat-elevate-write-count-for-vfs-mknod-create
> 2007-06-21 23:23:25.000000000 -0700
> +++ lxc-dave/fs/namei.c 2007-06-21 23:23:25.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1897,14 +1897,26 @@ asmlinkage long sys_mknodat(int dfd, con
> if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
> switch (mode & S_IFMT) {
> case 0: case S_IFREG:
> + error = mnt_want_write(nd.mnt);
> + if (error)
> + break;
> error = vfs_create(nd.dentry->d_inode,dentry,mode,&nd);
> + mnt_drop_write(nd.mnt);
> break;
> case S_IFCHR: case S_IFBLK:
> + error = mnt_want_write(nd.mnt);
> + if (error)
> + break;
> error = vfs_mknod(nd.dentry->d_inode,dentry,mode,
> new_decode_dev(dev));
> + mnt_drop_write(nd.mnt);
> break;
> case S_IFIFO: case S_IFSOCK:
> + error = mnt_want_write(nd.mnt);
> + if (error)
> + break;
> error = vfs_mknod(nd.dentry->d_inode,dentry,mode,0);
> + mnt_drop_write(nd.mnt);
> break;
> case S_IFDIR:
> error = -EPERM;
Should we just take the calls outside the switch statement?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
