On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Richard Gooch wrote:

>No, the reason for having /tmp on a separate FS is so that damage to
>/tmp (which you don't care about) can't affect /. The more you write
>to a FS, the more chance you have of damaging it, even parts that you
>don't write to.

Of course if you put /tmp in another disk this make sense.

But if you take it in the same disk but in a different partition,
supposing as you say that you'll genrated defective sectors in /tmp
because it's too much stressed compared to the rest of the disk, then you
could have all the machine blocked all the time rereading one sector for
half a minute maybe plus scsi aborts and so on.

The best is to distribute the load of the I/O all over the place IMHO. So
you can just look at the time the HD is supposed to run fine, and after
such time you replace the HD.

Andrea

Reply via email to