> Hi!
> 
> > But the fact that we don't have a working revoke() is the more important
> > problem. Forget local attacks. What about telnet to port 80, type GET
> > /~user/bigassgif.gif, and hit ^]^Z so the transfer will never finish? rm
> > needs some teeth for such situations.
> 
> You don't need revoke() to do this. Just > ~user/bigassgif.gif; rm
> ~user/bigassgif.gif will work in all cases. Anybody adding option to
> rm to do exactly this?
  By this you will get rid of problems with data blocks but not with inodes.
I agree that data blocks are more important but the problem will be still    
+there...                                                                    

                                                                Honza.

Reply via email to