> Hi!
>
> > But the fact that we don't have a working revoke() is the more important
> > problem. Forget local attacks. What about telnet to port 80, type GET
> > /~user/bigassgif.gif, and hit ^]^Z so the transfer will never finish? rm
> > needs some teeth for such situations.
>
> You don't need revoke() to do this. Just > ~user/bigassgif.gif; rm
> ~user/bigassgif.gif will work in all cases. Anybody adding option to
> rm to do exactly this?
By this you will get rid of problems with data blocks but not with inodes.
I agree that data blocks are more important but the problem will be still
+there...
Honza.
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Peter Samuelson
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Steve Dodd
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Richard Gooch
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Richard Gooch
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Alan Curry
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Richard Gooch
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Alan Curry
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Richard Gooch
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Pavel Machek
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Jan Kara
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Ed Hall
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Tigran Aivazian
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Alexander Viro
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Alexander Viro
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Richard Gooch
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Alexander Viro
- Re: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826) Andrea Arcangeli
