"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:30:42 +0000
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> They say "device or resource busy" several times then give up,
> leaving a dirty fs.
>
> Does it actually run a full e2fsck on the filesystem upon
> reboot?
Sometimes the umount retries a few times then succeeds. But more than
half the time a fsck is forced.
So it looks like there could be something going on here. I'll pay a bit
more attention later on today, see if I can generate a more coherent
problem report.
This is definitely changed behaviour relative to pre4-1. I think Al did
something to umount recently?
--
-akpm-
