On Tue, 2 May 2000, Chris Mason wrote:

> So the reiserfs team has to fix a problem NFS only has when interacting
> with reiserfs.  Yes, it would have been nice if someone else had the
> chance to do it for us, but to expect them to, and to be mad when
> they don't, is more than a little silly.  Its time to move on Hans, we
> have more important things to worry about.

Sigh... Folks, if the knfsd problem is the only one left - you have my
vote for temporary inclusion of the *@!#^* ->read_inode2(). AFAICS it's
the least of anyone's problems. It can be fixed, fix is not going to be 
reiserfs-dependent and is unlikely to require additional code in reiserfs. 
IWBNI Hans would understand the code in fs/reiserfs/* and existing
problems with it, but frankly, I don't see how it really matters.

As for the "cooperation" bit - huh? What, Hans can contribute something to
discussing the technical side of things? Then he was successfully hiding
that fact for years. I definitely have no problems with the rest of your
team and my problems with Hans... let's keep them separate, OK? I'll start
getting worry about that when I'll see a single technical posting from
Hans that would not consist of forwarding most of the questions to other
people.

Reply via email to