On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Philipp Zabel <[email protected]> wrote: > This corrects the gpiod_direction_output description comment > and adds clarification about the value parameter being a raw > value, not taking into account ACTIVE_LOW status.
Mmm, that's something I must have missed. I'd say gpiod_direction_output() should on the contrary honor the ACTIVE_LOW flag, and maybe we should also have gpiod_direction_output_raw() to allow control of the raw value? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
