Am Dienstag, den 07.01.2014, 19:39 +0900 schrieb Alexandre Courbot: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Philipp Zabel <[email protected]> wrote: > > This corrects the gpiod_direction_output description comment > > and adds clarification about the value parameter being a raw > > value, not taking into account ACTIVE_LOW status. > > Mmm, that's something I must have missed. I'd say > gpiod_direction_output() should on the contrary honor the ACTIVE_LOW > flag, and maybe we should also have gpiod_direction_output_raw() to > allow control of the raw value?
As I just stumbled over this misinterpreting the gpiod_direction_output value, I'd lean towards yes. Should then gpio_direction_store and gpio_request_one use gpiod_direction_output_raw? regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
