On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Barry Song <[email protected]> wrote:
> my point is that will we make the gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip() more > general for this kind of cases too since you have had a good API to > wrap things? As it only wraps two function calls I'm leaning toward deleting it as it might create more complexity than it removes. Not sure. We don't have a similar handler for registering nested threaded irq handlers so it's not really helpful. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
