2014-04-24 21:06 GMT+08:00, Linus Walleij <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Barry Song <[email protected]> wrote: > >> my point is that will we make the gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip() more >> general for this kind of cases too since you have had a good API to >> wrap things? > > As it only wraps two function calls I'm leaning toward deleting it as it > might create more complexity than it removes. Not sure.
i do agree that we can remove it if it doesn't really support general gpiochip. i think it is popular that some gpiochip has several irq parents. so people might get confused by this API as it actually doesn't really help many. > > We don't have a similar handler for registering nested threaded > irq handlers so it's not really helpful. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > -barry -barry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
