Hi Lars and Linus,

On 08/29/2014 09:34 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 09:20 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 08/21/2014 02:40 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When looking up the IRQ the bank offset needs to be taken into account.
>>>>> Otherwise interrupts for banks other than bank 0 get incorrectly reported
>>>>> as
>>>>> interrupts for bank 0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>>           * Use lookup table instead of switch-case.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I tried to apply this, but it doesn't apply on top of the other patch
>>>> "gpio: zynq: Fix IRQ handlers" that I have queued for fixes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Works fine for me. Did you try to apply both patch 1 and 2 of this series or
>>> just patch 2?
>>
>> Yes, and on my fixes branch, as well as on Torvald's master (which now
>> has patch 1/2) this happens:
>>
>> ]$ git am --signoff zynq2.patch
>> Applying: gpio: zynq: Take bank offset into account when reporting a IRQ
>> error: patch failed: drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c:461
>> error: drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c: patch does not apply
>> Patch failed at 0001 gpio: zynq: Take bank offset into account when
>> reporting a IRQ
>>
>> Can you please test applying this patch only on upstream this and figure
>> out what is wrong?
> 
> I think there is some confusion here, maybe two different series got mixed 
> up. Patch 1 of this series is "gpio: zynq: Reduce level of indention in 
> zynq_gpio_irqhandler()", which you just applied, but which is not in Linus' 
> tree or the public gpio tree yet.

I have no problem to apply that patches on the top of Linus tree.
Here is the branch with that two patches.
http://git.monstr.eu/?p=linux-2.6-microblaze.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/xnext/zynq-gpio

Feel free to cherry pick them from this branch.

Thanks,
Michal



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to