On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Octavian Purdila <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/16/2014 04:40 PM, Axel Lin wrote: >>>> >>>> dln2_gpio_direction_output() ignored the state passed into it. Fix it. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> Tested-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> >> >> Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> >> >> But this seems to apply to patches in mid-flight, could it be squashed >> there maybe? > > Sure, I can add it to the existing series, but I prefer to keep it as > separate patch. Is that ok with you?
Why? This is clearly a fix, so if the series is not merged yet, doesn't it make more sense to squash it and have the desired functionality from the start? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
