On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Octavian Purdila <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Octavian Purdila >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12/16/2014 04:40 PM, Axel Lin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> dln2_gpio_direction_output() ignored the state passed into it. Fix it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tested-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> But this seems to apply to patches in mid-flight, could it be squashed >>>> there maybe? >>> >>> Sure, I can add it to the existing series, but I prefer to keep it as >>> separate patch. Is that ok with you? >> >> Why? This is clearly a fix, so if the series is not merged yet, >> doesn't it make more sense to squash it and have the desired >> functionality from the start? > > The fix is not for issues introduced by the series, but for an issue > existing in the already merged code. Also it is a separate issue then > the one fixed in the other patches in the series.
Allright, I thought none of the DL2 support has been fixed yet (as I cannot see it in Linus W.'s tree). You know better what the state of your patches is, so please do what you think is best. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
