Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2005-12-13T11:02:16, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, that should work too, iff the resource supports this.
While there is nothing in the CRM to prevent it, the option passing
required would make it unlikely that the RA would support it -
certainly the ones we ship do not.
Well, take for example a group consisting of a (hypothetical) cluster
file system mount, a cluster alias IP (both of with are clone-enabled)
and a webserver.
The webserver doesn't need to know its running as a clone, it will just
serve its data from the shared filesystem via the IP alias.
So "support" is probably a bit overstated - maybe I should have said
"which supports it by not requiring special support", but that would
have been a bit misleading ;-)
Thanks for the clarification.
So, if I understand this correctly.
RAs don't _have_ to do anything special to support clones - but lots of
RAs may not work - for reasons related to the underlying resource.
So from an API perspective, they're supported, but they may or not be
supported by the underlying resource.
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
