Nate Reed wrote:
If it doesn't work with "abitrary resources and constraints" then what exactly
does it test? What is the purpose of CTS? Sorry if I'm being dense....
CTS is what we use to test releases before putting them out. We can't
test every possible combination. As it is, it typically takes 4-6 days
to get all the tests run. If we expanded that to be even broader, then
it would take years to complete.
It makes some assumptions about them which your configuration might not
conform to. For example, it assumes that if you have quorum that all
resources ought to be running - somewhere.
You can define constraints such that this isn't true. So, if you define
them that way, then we might get all excited and declare a failure in
some circumstance where it correctly doesn't start a resource.
I would guess that CTS might not deal well with resources that aren't in
groups. Or groups of groups, or other things that are perfectly legal,
but we didn't think about when designing the test harness.
We can't test every possible combination. So, your resources are likely
to work fine, but maybe not.
I'd give it a try. It's not that likely that you do things that violate
the assumptions of the test harness.
Let us know how it goes.
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
