On 1/26/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > > On Jan 19, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > > >> On 2006-01-19T10:12:28, Nate Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'm curious how the CTS is being used today. I heard it's mainly a > >>> tool for Linux-HA developers. Is it currently used for automated > >>> testing? Are there any users who are using it to test their > >>> clusters? > >>> > >>> I have not had much luck with it yet. I am interested in helping get > >>> it ready for general use. > >> > >> It's mainly used for automated testing. > >> > >> The ability for it to "attach" to a configured real-life cluster (ie, > >> one configured with real resources, constraints etc) and put that one > >> through the paces (as part of pre-production or pilot testing) would be > >> _great_. > >> > > > > Um, as long as its stopped you can have it do that now. Just don't > > tell CTS to overwrite the CIB on all the nodes... > > > > python ./CTSlab.py -L /var/log/cluster.log -2 100 > > > >> I can't offer money, but I'll order you _that_ big a pizza you'll be > >> seriously stuffed. ;-) > > > > Can I have the pizza now? I skipped breakfast today... > > It probably doesn't actually work correctly with arbitrary resources and > constraints. > > In fact, it's nearly certain it doesn't. >
I guess the part that doesn't work is the resource auditing and ResourceRecover test. I think I just really wanted a pizza. _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
