Isnt there a revised OCF standard for the membership API? Perhaps we should be implementing this rather than patching the current implementation (especially in a way that it would no longer conform to the existing standard).
On 3/7/06, Huang Zhen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, all > > There are three parts of improvment. > 1. Change the API between the client of ccm library. Thus we can provide more > information to the client. We have ocf_membership.h already. However, it was > not implemented. > Maybe we can start based on ocf_memebership.h. > > 2. The communication between the ccm library and ccm is a little redundent as > I understand. > I will simplify this part. This will not affect the client, the api, or the > communication > between nodes. > > 3. The algorithm of CCM. If we need improve the performance or something like > that, we need > change the algorithm of CCM. But this may cause the change of messages > between nodes. > So we should not do this except we meet a problem which can't deal with in > other way. > I won't do this change. > > So what I need your suggestion is the first part. > Of cause the comment on other two parts are welcome too. > > Thanks. > > > > Guochun Shi wrote: > > Zhen, > > > > Alan may have mentioned you already but I want to emphasize it since I > > forgot it lots of times :) > > CCM should keep back compatibility as much as possible while you change it. > > > > Other than that I think it is ok to change it anyway you want it. As far > > as I remember, there are some > > redundent code/structure that you can simplify. Last time you mentioned > > rewriting CCM, I am not sure if > > it is a good idea since it involves lots of time and testing. Let me > > know if I can help. > > > > thanks > > -Guochun > > > > > > > > Huang Zhen wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> With the development of heartbeat 2, CCM(membership) may need be > >> reorganized to fit some new requirement from CRM. > >> Like provide the whole node list of cluster whatever the node is > >> active or dead. > >> And we find we may need improve the performance of CCM. > >> > >> Would you like to share your thoughts about how to improvment CCM? > >> > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > -- > Best Regards, > Huang Zhen > Linux Technology Center > IBM China Development Lab, Beijing > Telno: (8610)82782244-2845 > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
