Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 3/7/06, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-03-07T18:13:24, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isnt there a revised OCF standard for the membership API?
Perhaps we should be implementing this rather than patching the
current implementation (especially in a way that it would no longer
conform to the existing standard).
Given that there's only one existing implementation of said standard we
ought to make sure that this implementation/interface works for us and
then revise the "standard" again. ;-)
But thats the thing... I thought (from talking to alanr) that the
problems with the API were well known and had already been addressed
in a subsequent revisions of the standard.
Several of the issues we're having are addressed by the new standard -
but not all of them. And this proposed standard introduced a new bug
(not knowledge of quorum).
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
