On May 2, 2006, at 10:15 PM, Matthew Soffen wrote: The change I did was bascially make it so that it searched for any version of the libtools.
The bootstrap should be able to find the correct binary for Darwin ( glibtool ) .
Can you try my change to see if it works on darwin.. If it doesn't, run it sh -x to get the full output before it fails.
i think the problem is that which always returns 1 here... no idea why.
but i'm really curious to know why my additions failed for you... surely you wouldn't have gone further than:
# On some systems we have to make do with the presence of the command if [ "$arch" != "Linux" -a "$arch" != "Darwin" ]; then return 0; fi
Matt
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 21:42 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On May 2, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> I see you removed the section that allowed it to work on Darwin...
>> -if [ "$arch" = "Darwin" ]
>> I'm not particularly happy at this point
>
>
> It looks to me like he replaced the darwinism with a more general
> check for the various tools (but it's a little hard to tell from
> the diff).
nod, closer inspection revealed that
the irony is that in getting it to work on Darwin again I apparently
re-broke it on Solaris (or was it FreeBSD?)
so now Matt gets to be pissed at me :-(
*sigh*
--
Andrew Beekhof
"Ooo Ahhh, Glenn McRath" - TISM
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
-- Andrew Beekhof
"No means no, and no means yes, and everything in between and all the rest" - TISM
|
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
