On 2006-05-20T14:35:31, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the GUI can continue to set things the same way it does now, but
> internally we would handle both
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >Which is why I proposed the other, slightly less intrusive option,
> >which we can simply put in reasonably soon, and then, with more time
> >at our hands, look at the above.
>
> actually the first option is less intrusive (in fact its almost done)
>
> looking in a different place for the meta options is far easier than
> searching for two different names throughout the code.
Uhm, can you please keep that out of CVS for the time being? ;-)
Besides, you still have to look in two places, how's that easier than
looking for two names, don't you have to do that everywhere too? That
sounds like a simple function call.
Implementing it as the first option may be less intrusive to the CRM
(I'll let you be the judge of that), but it certainly causes more effort
for everyone else.
Maybe Alan has an opinion on this one too ;-)
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
