Hi,
In my two-node cluster the ip specified in haresources
is getting masqueraded in both machines.
Configuration files are as follows:-
---------------------------------------------
1.haresources:
master 192.168.184.69 rsyncserver
slave_mac rsynclient
2.ha.cf
logfile /var/log/ha-log
keepalive 2
deadtime 10
warntime 4
initdead 30
node master
node slave_mac
bcast neoeth0
udpport 694
auto_failback on
coredumps true
debug 0
realtime on
use_logd off
As shown below the , IP written in haresources is on
both machine
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008]# uname -n
master
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008]# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
00:0C:29:8D:3F:C2
UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST
MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:3317 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1661 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:380532 (371.6 Kb) TX bytes:333306
(325.4 Kb)
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x1400
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
00:0C:29:8D:3F:CC
inet addr:192.168.11.129
Bcast:192.168.11.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
Metric:1
RX packets:909 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
frame:0
TX packets:14 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:208698 (203.8 Kb) TX bytes:588
(588.0 b)
Interrupt:9 Base address:0x1480
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
frame:0
TX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:1000 (1000.0 b) TX bytes:1000
(1000.0 b)
neoeth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
00:0C:29:8D:3F:C2
inet addr:192.168.184.129
Bcast:192.168.184.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
Metric:1
RX packets:2847 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1668 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:293663 (286.7 Kb) TX bytes:336180
(328.3 Kb)
neoeth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
00:0C:29:8D:3F:C2
inet addr:192.168.184.69
Bcast:192.168.184.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
Metric:1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# uname -n
slave_mac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
00:0C:29:F2:01:F3
UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST
MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:118285 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:85694 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:28751827 (27.4 Mb) TX
bytes:8001939 (7.6 Mb)
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x1400
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
00:0C:29:F2:01:FD
inet addr:192.168.11.130
Bcast:192.168.11.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
Metric:1
RX packets:36083 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2772 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:24052810 (22.9 Mb) TX bytes:223247
(218.0 Kb)
Interrupt:9 Base address:0x1480
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:36 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
frame:0
TX packets:36 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:3614 (3.5 Kb) TX bytes:3614 (3.5
Kb)
neoeth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
00:0C:29:F2:01:F3
inet addr:192.168.184.130
Bcast:192.168.184.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
Metric:1
RX packets:77279 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:85692 errors:0 dropped:0
overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:4989385 (4.7 Mb) TX bytes:8002641
(7.6 Mb)
neoeth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
00:0C:29:F2:01:F3
inet addr:192.168.184.69
Bcast:192.168.184.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
Metric:1
I am most probably using 1.31 as shown by this
ResourceManager script
($Id: ResourceManager.in,v 1.31 2005/08/31 16:03:02
alan Exp $)
I am not using crm. I am using very basic setup of
heartbeat with SPOF ;both nodes are on the same
ethernet LAN.
NOTE: My rsynclient resource script takes a while to
complete, is that a problem?
Also timings in various timers is too short in here ?
or it will work smoothly ??
Thanks for your patience
Nish
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
