On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:17:54AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On 8/28/06, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hello again, > > > >This kind of thing makes crm_verify cry faul: > > in what way?
sapcl01:~ # crm_verify -L -V element operations: validity error : Element operations content does not follow the DTD, expecting (op)*, got (op instance_attributes ) crm_verify[3437]: 2006/08/30_11:40:17 ERROR: validate_with_dtd:xml.c CIB does not validate against /usr/lib/heartbeat/crm.dtd crm_verify[3437]: 2006/08/30_11:40:17 ERROR: main:crm_verify.c CIB did not pass DTD validation Errors found during check: config not valid At any rate, the setting never gets to the RA. Cheers, Dejan > > > > > <primitive class="ocf" id="apache_a1" provider="heartbeat" > > type="apache"> > > <operations> > > <op id="apache_a1_mon" interval="120s" name="monitor" > > timeout="60s"/> > > <instance_attributes id="apache_a1_mon_attr"> > > <attributes> > > <nvpair id="apache_a1_mon_attr_0" name="OCF_CHECK_LEVEL" > > value="20"/> > > </attributes> > > </instance_attributes> > > </operations> > > .... > > </primitive> > > > >Is this the way it's supposed to work but hasn't yet been > >implemented? > > > >Or how else should the OCF_CHECK_LEVEL be set? > > > >Cheers, > > > >Dejan > > > >On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:09:54PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On 8/16/06, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >On 2006-08-16T18:44:20, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Since I need different levels of monitoring rather urgently, I > >> >> thought that it would be preferable to use the "depth" property > >> >> and then code the resource agent correspondingly. > >> >> > >> >> But, it seems like it hasn't been implemented yet. Right? > >> > > >> >I think it has been? > >> > >> IPaddr in CVS (not 2.0.7) has a trivial example > >> > >> > > >> > > >> >_______________________________________________________ > >> >Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > >> >http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > >> >Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > >> > > >> _______________________________________________________ > >> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > >_______________________________________________________ > >Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > >http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > >Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
