Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 9/6/06, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2006-08-31T08:37:55, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> BTW, this is not correct:
>>
>> > >>            <op id="apache_a1_mon" interval="120s" name="monitor"
>> > >>            timeout="60s">
>> > >>               <instance_attributes id="apache_a1_mon_attr">
>> > >>                 <attributes>
>> > >>                    <nvpair id="apache_a1_mon_attr_0"
>> > >name="OCF_CHECK_LEVEL"
>> > >>                   value="20"/>
>> > >>                  </attributes>
>> > >>                </instance_attributes>
>> > >>           </op>
>>
>> Or, rather, it is correct syntactically for the CIB, but not consistent
>> with the OCF RA spec. This is going to come through in the environment
>> as "OCF_RESKEY_OCF_CHECK_LEVEL".
> 
> actually it is.  ocf-shellfuncs specifically handles this case and
> sets OCF_CHECK_LEVEL=$OCF_RESKEY_OCF_CHECK_LEVEL if a value is set.

We should probably fix that in the OCF plugin.  It would be easy enough
to do...


-- 
    Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship...  Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to