On 2/21/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/21/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/12/07, Tijl Van den Broeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fixed up riloe.in and patch (see attached files) > > > > Anyone with python knowledge, feel free to improve. > > > > Sure hope this works on older iLO versions, since I could only test it > > on recent ones. > > wow - thats really much clearer. thankyou! > > how are the various args are set?ah, from the CIB (and without a prefix added - which is what threw me) we should probably retain or at least support the old variable names... was there a particular reason for changing them?
i cleaned up the patch a little - any chance you can test I didnt break anything before I commit? (i tweaked the input parameters a bit too, UPPERCASE is not very readable)
> > > On 2/12/07, Tijl Van den Broeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Also sorry for delay as well :-) Family emergency last few weeks. > > > > > > Ehm.. well the documentation and examples from HP about communication > > > to the iLO is all in perl. > > > And let's say that my python is possibly worse than perl :-) Apart > > > from that I'm willing to try and convert it to python. As I've noticed > > > something else, using perl implies that you need openssl modules > > > installed for perl so python would be a more user friendly option. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > >
today.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
