On 2/21/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/21/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/21/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ah, from the CIB (and without a prefix added - which is what threw me) > > we should probably retain or at least support the old variable > names... was there a particular reason for changing them?
No, I just changed them to make it more "understandable", but to keep 'm backwards compatible you're right. We should try to keep the initial naming scheme.
i cleaned up the patch a little - any chance you can test I didnt break anything before I commit?
I will test it asap and let you known.
(i tweaked the input parameters a bit too, UPPERCASE is not very readable) >
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
