Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2007-02-22T16:13:18, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If the CRM is in the write path, something very bad is going on. Do you
>> think it is? If so, then I certainly can see the argument for locking
>> them into memory. Would you mind explaining the sequence of events
>> you're talking to for "write path" that involves the CRM?
>
> Heartbeat driven OCFS2, for example.
>
> Of course, that'd effectively mean needing to lock everything into
> memory, which is clearly infeasible and there's more work here to fix
> the theoretical deadlock issue.
>
> But, with the same argument, stonithd, which is not more timing critical
> than the LRM, probably shouldn't be using this then.
Stonithd is clearly in the execution path for rebooting. The operation
for rebooting a node does NOT go through the LRM.
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
