On 2007-02-22T20:30:10, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Of course, that'd effectively mean needing to lock everything into > > memory, which is clearly infeasible and there's more work here to fix > > the theoretical deadlock issue. > > > > But, with the same argument, stonithd, which is not more timing critical > > than the LRM, probably shouldn't be using this then. > > Stonithd is clearly in the execution path for rebooting. The operation > for rebooting a node does NOT go through the LRM.
Uhm. Everybody who _tells_ stonithd to perform a reboot is not in the protected part of the stack, so it's not really useful to have stonithd in there. _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
