-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Wrong too, because it will fail if asked to stop a resource with a > different netmask. I wasn't actually sure it needed fixing. I didn't apply it to my own tree because ip should not drop support for netmaskless ip removal or lots of different things will break. I wonder who idiot^H^H^H^H^H added that warning into ip. - -- Tuomo Soini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux and network services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy <http://foobar.fi/> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF7JfCTlrZKzwul1ERAhzeAJwI2yCPoytNtf91eWD/LC5KIvNnBACcCn/C oqL2Tqk6oEYTBU6YKTqSzog= =V0mC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
