On 3/29/07, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Results: Using the dev version or crm_master I still spin at the top of the
CPU stack. What's next?

probably time to log a bug...

can you include the logs of the crm_master command when you add
  -VVVVVVVV
(an insance amount of logging) to your normal command line

and your current CIB please


 Doug


 On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 10:06 -0400, Doug Knight wrote:

 OK, ConfigureMe make is complete. As when I built the baseline 2.0.8, I had
two compile errors, and had to make some minor source code mods (see
attached error message and file diffs). Not sure if this is related or not.
I've done a make install in the crm/admin directory to replace the
crm_master used by the system. I'll test that out in a bit.

 Doug

 On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 15:38 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
 On 3/29/07, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I went ahead and installed via RPM automake, autoconf, and libtool, even
> though they were not needed for the 2.0.8 baseline build (I believe
libtool
> at least may have been installed previously). ConfigureMe bootstrap ran
> fine. From the output I gather it includes the equivalent of the
ConfigureMe
> configure run, and now I just need to do the make?

right

>
> Doug
>
> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 09:23 -0400, Doug Knight wrote:
>
> OK, Tried that, no luck. It still complains about libtool, autoconf, and
> automake. When I copy over the same basic files from the 2.0.8 directory,
> bootstrap still does not work, but ConfigureMe configure does (at least to
> the point where it starts looking for the Makefile.in files).
>
> Doug
>
> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 09:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> pretty sure you need:
> ./ConfigureMe bootstrap
>
> On 3/28/07, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Alan and Lars,
> > After much effort, I have had no success in building from the mercurial
> > version. Here's what I tried, and since this is the first time I've
tried
> to
> > build a dev version, maybe you can see where I'm going wrong:
> >
> > Downloaded tar from hg.linux-ha.org/dev
> > Unpacked it in a subdirectory to my root account, HA
> > Attempted a quick ConfigureMe configure, got errors that it couldn't
find
> > libtool, automake, autoconf
> > Did a side-by-side comparison to the HA 2.0.8 I built successfully and
am
> > running with, found no libltdl.tar or libltdl directory under the dev
> > version. Copied these from my original stable release tar into the
> directory
> > structure for the dev version.
> > Ran ConfigureMe configure, which then complained about all the
Makefile.in
> > files missing. Copied those over as well from the side-by-side. Also
> pulled
> > include/ha_config.h.in and linux-ha/config.h.in since it complained
about
> > those missing too.
> > ConfigureMe configure runs to completion
> > ConfigureMe make exits with the following:
> >
> > In file included from base64.c:18:
> > ../../include/heartbeat.h:38:23: error: hb_config.h: No
> > such file or directory
> > ../../include/heartbeat.h:98:1: error: "HB_RC_DIR" redefined
> > In file included from ../../include/lha_internal.h:37,
> > from base64.c:17:
> > ../../linux-ha/config.h:504:1: error: this is the location of the
previous
> > definition
> > In file included from base64.c:18:
> > ../../include/heartbeat.h:102:1: error: "HALIB"
redefined
> > <command line>:1:1: error: this is the location of the previous
definition
> > gmake[2]: *** [base64.lo] Error 1
> > gmake[2]: Leaving directory
> > `/root/HA/Heartbeat-Dev-829e377e00bd/lib/clplumbing'
> > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > gmake[1]: Leaving directory
> > `/root/HA/Heartbeat-Dev-829e377e00bd/lib'
> > gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> >
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Doug
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 16:06 -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
> > Doug Knight wrote:
> > > Got it. The attached file contains the strace from the second attempt
by
> > > heartbeat to start the resource up as master, right up until it was
> > > killed. The resource already showed failed on the gui. I zipped it up
> > > using gzip.
> >
> > Lars asked a good question as well...
> >
> > Could you kindly reproduce this with the current Mercurial tip version?
> >
> > Thanks1
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
>
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/


 _______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/


_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/


_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to