Andrew, Alan, Lars, et al, Any updates on the spinning crm_master? I and an associate of mine here are looking into compiler flags and settings to see if we can find anything there. If there is more info you need, just let me know.
Doug On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 11:15 -0400, Doug Knight wrote: > I've done some more looking at the cib_attrs.c module > find_attr_details function, and it seems that the call to > find_xml_children filtering by node eventually finds a match > (match_found = 1 in xml.c/find_xml_children) terminating the recursive > search. Later in the module, the call to find_xml_children filtering > by name gets a match but continues to search. I never see the "search > by set:" in the debug log, nor the printf I've placed in my version > right after the call to find_xml_children. In fact, it seems that > somehow find_xml_children loops within itself, though I must really be > missing something there. > > Doug > > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 08:20 -0400, Doug Knight wrote: > > > Andrew, FYI, the one I ran has some debug statements in it that I > > put in there. Let me know if you want cleaner output... > > > > Doug > > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 07:44 -0400, Doug Knight wrote: > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > I'll get to this today. I've been digging through some of the > > > source, putting in some additional logging, etc, just to see where > > > the problem occurs. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Doug > > > > > > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 10:32 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > > > > > On 3/29/07, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Results: Using the dev version or crm_master I still spin at the top > > > > > of the > > > > > CPU stack. What's next? > > > > > > > > probably time to log a bug... > > > > > > > > can you include the logs of the crm_master command when you add > > > > -VVVVVVVV > > > > (an insance amount of logging) to your normal command line > > > > > > > > and your current CIB please > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Doug > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 10:06 -0400, Doug Knight wrote: > > > > > > > > > > OK, ConfigureMe make is complete. As when I built the baseline > > > > > 2.0.8, I had > > > > > two compile errors, and had to make some minor source code mods (see > > > > > attached error message and file diffs). Not sure if this is related > > > > > or not. > > > > > I've done a make install in the crm/admin directory to replace the > > > > > crm_master used by the system. I'll test that out in a bit. > > > > > > > > > > Doug > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 15:38 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > > > On 3/29/07, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I went ahead and installed via RPM automake, autoconf, and libtool, > > > > > > even > > > > > > though they were not needed for the 2.0.8 baseline build (I believe > > > > > libtool > > > > > > at least may have been installed previously). ConfigureMe bootstrap > > > > > > ran > > > > > > fine. From the output I gather it includes the equivalent of the > > > > > ConfigureMe > > > > > > configure run, and now I just need to do the make? > > > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Doug > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 09:23 -0400, Doug Knight wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, Tried that, no luck. It still complains about libtool, > > > > > > autoconf, and > > > > > > automake. When I copy over the same basic files from the 2.0.8 > > > > > > directory, > > > > > > bootstrap still does not work, but ConfigureMe configure does (at > > > > > > least to > > > > > > the point where it starts looking for the Makefile.in files). > > > > > > > > > > > > Doug > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 09:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > > > > pretty sure you need: > > > > > > ./ConfigureMe bootstrap > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/28/07, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alan and Lars, > > > > > > > After much effort, I have had no success in building from the > > > > > > > mercurial > > > > > > > version. Here's what I tried, and since this is the first time > > > > > > > I've > > > > > tried > > > > > > to > > > > > > > build a dev version, maybe you can see where I'm going wrong: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Downloaded tar from hg.linux-ha.org/dev > > > > > > > Unpacked it in a subdirectory to my root account, HA > > > > > > > Attempted a quick ConfigureMe configure, got errors that it > > > > > > > couldn't > > > > > find > > > > > > > libtool, automake, autoconf > > > > > > > Did a side-by-side comparison to the HA 2.0.8 I built > > > > > > > successfully and > > > > > am > > > > > > > running with, found no libltdl.tar or libltdl directory under the > > > > > > > dev > > > > > > > version. Copied these from my original stable release tar into the > > > > > > directory > > > > > > > structure for the dev version. > > > > > > > Ran ConfigureMe configure, which then complained about all the > > > > > Makefile.in > > > > > > > files missing. Copied those over as well from the side-by-side. > > > > > > > Also > > > > > > pulled > > > > > > > include/ha_config.h.in and linux-ha/config.h.in since it > > > > > > > complained > > > > > about > > > > > > > those missing too. > > > > > > > ConfigureMe configure runs to completion > > > > > > > ConfigureMe make exits with the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In file included from base64.c:18: > > > > > > > ../../include/heartbeat.h:38:23: error: hb_config.h: No > > > > > > > such file or directory > > > > > > > ../../include/heartbeat.h:98:1: error: "HB_RC_DIR" redefined > > > > > > > In file included from ../../include/lha_internal.h:37, > > > > > > > from base64.c:17: > > > > > > > ../../linux-ha/config.h:504:1: error: this is the location of the > > > > > previous > > > > > > > definition > > > > > > > In file included from base64.c:18: > > > > > > > ../../include/heartbeat.h:102:1: error: "HALIB" > > > > > redefined > > > > > > > <command line>:1:1: error: this is the location of the previous > > > > > definition > > > > > > > gmake[2]: *** [base64.lo] Error 1 > > > > > > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > > > > > > > `/root/HA/Heartbeat-Dev-829e377e00bd/lib/clplumbing' > > > > > > > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > > > > > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > > > > > > > `/root/HA/Heartbeat-Dev-829e377e00bd/lib' > > > > > > > gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Doug > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 16:06 -0600, Alan Robertson wrote: > > > > > > > Doug Knight wrote: > > > > > > > > Got it. The attached file contains the strace from the second > > > > > > > > attempt > > > > > by > > > > > > > > heartbeat to start the resource up as master, right up until it > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > killed. The resource already showed failed on the gui. I zipped > > > > > > > > it up > > > > > > > > using gzip. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lars asked a good question as well... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you kindly reproduce this with the current Mercurial tip > > > > > > > version? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
