> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Beekhof > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 4:29 PM > To: High-Availability Linux Development List > Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] transition graphs during fail-over process > > On 4/19/07, Junko IKEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is not a serious problem but I just take notice of this, so please let > > me know whether this is a common behavior for Heartbeat or not, if you know > > anything about it. > > > > There are two nodes, a virtual IP (IPaddr) is running on one of them. > > If the IPaddr is taken away, fail-over process is sure to succeed. > > What I notice is; > > Heartbeat starts IPaddr on the node which it has already been dead first (it > > would fail), and next, do it on the stand-by node. > > Why does Heartbeat try to (re)start the resource on the failed node again? > > presumably because you told us to run there if we can
I agree, some might want to do that. I feel that it's a waste of time for failover... In their opinion, if the first trial (re-start a resource on the failed node) succeed, we won't see a failover, right? Is there no possibility that a resource try to restart again and again on the same node? > > I don't understand why "pe-input3.bz2" was needed. > > it wasn't used? > if so, its likely some event happened which invalidated the transition > before it could be started yes, this graph didn't carry out and next one was run. Thanks a lot for your quick response! Junko Ikeda _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
