On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:52:01AM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2007-07-11T13:12:41, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Although I breifly spoke with Lars about this on IRC, > > I'm a little confused about changeset cf4e9638ffa5. > > > > On the Debian side of things it does the following to the heartbeat package. > > 1. removes /usr/lib/heartbeat/ha_logger > > 2. adds /usr/sbin/ha_logger > > > > The change works, and does _not_ break the build in any way. However, > > doing a sample build I note that the removed file still exists in the > > tree that make install creates (though it isn't included in the Debian > > package). Is this desired? Should it be in Debian? Should it not be > > installed by make install? > > > > I believe that as things stand both /usr/lib/heartbeat/ha_logger and > > /usr/sbin/ha_logger will end up in RPM packages, though I haven't tested > > this theory. > > You're right. The location of the binary was copied, not moved. Sigh. > Just adding the former location back to the Debian package should be > sufficient.
I will make it so. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
