On 2007-07-18T15:56:56, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have gotten enough negative remarks to last the rest of my life about
> things related to releases, and got agreement on these procedures. I'm
> not opening up any new can of worms, by failing to follow the documented
> procedures.
If I (of all people! ;-) may try to build a bridge here:
What Andrew seems to be saying is that he considers all the fixes he
pushes to dev worthy for the next release, so that sending additional
e-mails (beyond this e-mail stating such) isn't really needed.
So, it's your decision whether you want to cherry pick them over to
testing or not; the commit message ought to carry enough information. If
not, please follow up and ask.
Seems that there's not really a contradiction between the two
positions.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
